Soldier77 What's the phone # for the service desk?
It's (845)306-1000. The number for Patterson. Just ask for the Service Department. They will ask your reason for calling.
i recently called the service department about this.
first off, what i read in another post is correct.
the person you talk with will not give you their name.. i asked the question and the brother responds by saying that yes, they get that question all the time.. then he proceeds to tell me that i need to write in to the society with my question and they will give me plenty of information to back up their standing on it.. i told him that i searched the wl cdrom and found nothing, not even under questions from readers.
Soldier77 What's the phone # for the service desk?
It's (845)306-1000. The number for Patterson. Just ask for the Service Department. They will ask your reason for calling.
i recently called the service department about this.
first off, what i read in another post is correct.
the person you talk with will not give you their name.. i asked the question and the brother responds by saying that yes, they get that question all the time.. then he proceeds to tell me that i need to write in to the society with my question and they will give me plenty of information to back up their standing on it.. i told him that i searched the wl cdrom and found nothing, not even under questions from readers.
I recently called the service department about this. First off, what I read in another post is correct. The person you talk with WILL NOT give you their name.
I asked the question and the brother responds by saying that yes, they get that question ALL the time.
Then he proceeds to tell me that I need to write in to the society with my question and they will give me plenty of information to back up their standing on it.
I told him that I searched the WL CDROM and found nothing, not even under questions from readers. Now if the question comes up so much, why hasn't it ever been addressed to the masses through perhaps the Watchtower (that's one word, LOL) magazine? (I know the answer. Keep the blinders on.)
What has been the experience of others here?
CoC
a year ago i read a post where one argued the 587 bc with only insight and the bible, but i have lost it and can't find it again.
can someone help me with that, please?.
I called the service department recently and asked them about 607/587. They didn't answer the question but instead told me to write in and they would provide me information. Yea right!! I'm really going to give them my name and address.
I wanted to start a post on that especially now that I see someone else has done the same thing.
Oh and thanks for the link.
CoC
i'm sure this topic has been brought up before.
i was at a jw graduation party yesterday and realized "if birthday parties are not okay because they supposedly bring undue attention to an individual, why are graduation parties and wedding anniversaries okay?
" they both glorify individuals and put them on a pedestal.
Excellent question/topic. But regardless, sounds like an excuse................................for a PARTY!!
Hiding Questioner - I thought to myself, hell no one buys a TV these days without Googling the brand/model on the internet. What makes me and other JWs think their religion is any different, especially given the level of commitment expected.
This is something I used once to try and reason with my wife. Anything I plan on, for example, purchasing, always requires research. If I want to buy a Sony TV, I don't just go to their site and expect them to tell me all the pros and cons. I see what others are saying about it/them.
Why should it be any different with my religion? What's to be hidden? When is the last time the Watchtower study and magazine spoke about what is wrong with the religion?
Oh and BTW, I don't consider myself a moron.......anymore!! LOL
wow.. unbelievable.. .
gubberningbody - Is it really so?
Yes Satan? ..................................Oh sorry, you sounded like someone else. LMBO!!
No seriously, I have thought the exact same thing. Have they found truth in the Catholic church or do they just feel it's a way to be close to God without the JW's? Especially thinking about how I feel disgusted with religion because of all their lies and atrocities, I couldn't see myself joining another religion if I left the JW's.
Crap is aways crap. I wouldn't go from one pile to the next and hope it was better than the last. IMO
CoC
for the past several weeks i have been seeing a wonderful therapist who ran a grief support group that i attended 1 1/2 years ago when my mom died.. at the time i was just absolutley shocked that after 30 years of being a wt slave only 5 people bothered to send a card regarding her passing.. i brought up to her in detail how the jw religion does not look favorably on anyone who doesn't agree 100% with their way of thinking, and moving forward that still affects me to a certain extent, esp.
the shunning.. well, she brought up several times how the witness "mindset" of collective thinking (i kept thinking of the borg in star trek ) discourages individuality.
this thinking has carried over in other aspects of my life, tendrils she said that work against other normal human behavior feelings.. the key is how a person deals positivley with the new way of dealing with unknown, or repressed emotions.
Count me in. I'm currently seeing a therapist also. And it's all mostly related to JW issues, but also includes some family issues. If it wasn't for the therapist, I don't know if I would have had the strength to slow down in my "service" without feeling full of guilt.
I feel great so far and am glad I made a move in this direction. I actually for once in my life feel a sort of real peace.
Man in Black, I wish you the best and congratulate you on your progress. I'm glad to hear what's happening in in your life regarding this. Keep going. It's worth the peace of mind.
CoC
i hear quite a bit of criticism about jehovah's witnesses enforcing 1 corinthians 5:9-13. while jehovah's witnesses have a formal system of maintaining the organization's core values; egocentric, self-worshiping secularists have an informal system of rejecting those of whom they have nothing in common with.
http://www.objectivistcenter.org/cth-32-390-religion.aspx.
most major religions have believed in the existence of a supernatural realm, a realm beyond the natural world of physical objects and bodies governed by causal laws, the world we perceive with our senses and can study by rational methods.
alice.in.wonderland - I have little time to play stupid games with people I assume are adults or reiterate the logical fallacy you're trying to use on me. I'm not “running in circles,” I'm communicating with knot heads.http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=knot head
knot head
A person who has trouble thinking in a logical progression. This is usually caused by a profound amount of circular reasoning tying their brain into a knot.
Is Alice in wonderbra serious? She accused me of circular reasoning.
Here is a good explanation I found on the evil internet to define circular reasoning. Does she even know what it means? Is she aware she is often involved in it?
§ DEFINITION
Circular Reasoning – supporting a premise with the premise rather than a conclusion.
Circular reasoning is an attempt to support a statement by simply repeating the statement in different or stronger terms. In this fallacy, the reason given is nothing more than a restatement of the conclusion that poses as the reason for the conclusion. To say, “You should exercise because it’s good for you” is really saying, “You should exercise because you should exercise.”
It shares much with the false authority fallacy because we accept these statements based solely on the fact that someone else claims it to be so. Often, we feel we can trust another person so much that we often accept his claims without testing the logic. This is called blind trust, and it is very dangerous. We might as well just talk in circles.
EXAMPLE 1
A confused student argues: “You can’t give me a C. I’m an A student!”
Circular reasoning is problematic because the claim is made on grounds that cannot be accepted as true — because those very grounds are in dispute. How can a student claim to be an A student when he just earned a C?
To clarify, no one is an “A student” by definition. Grades are earned in every class and are derived from a variety of different methods. The requirements in one class are set by the school and the instructor, so the same class taught by a different teacher or in a different location should yield two very different results (final grades). Merely claiming to be an A student does not make the claim valid.
NOTE: The false authority fallacy also applies here — you cannot use yourself as your own authority with total certainty. A doctor is more qualified to diagnose your shoulder pain than you are; your teachers are better qualified to evaluate your performance than a student.
EXAMPLE 2
A satisfied citizen says: “Richardson is the most successful mayor the town has ever had because he's the best mayor of our history.”
The second part of this sentence offers no evidence — it simply repeats the claim that was already presented. Don’t be fooled into believing that using the word “because” in an argument automatically provides a valid reason. Be sure to provide clear evidence to support your claims, not a version of the premise (the initial statement in an argument).
EXAMPLE 3
An obvious non-smoker blurts: “Can a person quit smoking? Of course — as long as he has sufficient willpower and really wants to quit.”
This statement contains a more subconscious version of circular reasoning. The intended argument simply repeats itself, disguised as a logical statement. The warrant is simple: “A person can quit because he can.” True, any smoker can quit, but the task is not as obvious or as easy to accomplish as the statement suggests. The arguer must provide reasons to suggest how a person can overcome an addiction, not to simply identify the obvious use of will power. This example also falls into distortion and the only reason fallacies.
Now who's circular reasoning, BIZNATCH!!
Damn! I just pulled an Alice. I copied and pasted for the sake of my defense!
CoC
reading the post "how long did it take you to leave", i can't help but be envious of those of you who refer to leaving as a "we" event.. i know it has been said that women tend to react to feelings/emotions along with logic, can you help me with ideas that got you to feel something was wrong?
what should i work on planting with my wife?.
thanks..
Wow 10p! I have high hopes that things can turn out the same with my wife. I asked her once if she felt I had changed in the way I treat her, despite her knowing my current feelings about being a witness. She said no.
I feel we have actually gotten closer. At this point, I'm being very subtle in what I say. She seems to listen but I don't push the issue. I really have found in all this that I love her deeply and truly want the best for her. So I'm doing my best to be patient with the situation.
Best regards to all in the struggle.
CoC
i hear quite a bit of criticism about jehovah's witnesses enforcing 1 corinthians 5:9-13. while jehovah's witnesses have a formal system of maintaining the organization's core values; egocentric, self-worshiping secularists have an informal system of rejecting those of whom they have nothing in common with.
http://www.objectivistcenter.org/cth-32-390-religion.aspx.
most major religions have believed in the existence of a supernatural realm, a realm beyond the natural world of physical objects and bodies governed by causal laws, the world we perceive with our senses and can study by rational methods.